You have motostrelki 3 times inside a deck? Go for VDV instead in the Skrezhekniet (or whatever this tongue breaker is called xD.ĪA with less than 2800m range against helis is always difficult to use because helis outrange you. You're doing it already but it looks to me like many of your units overlapp each other. Think about unit synergy and what the specified unit is supposed to do on the battlefield. The hide and seak game is the trickiest part of wargame. 10men elite recon inf can make for excellent infantry and come in 5p transports.
#Wher are my wargame red dragon replays stored code
It would be easier to look at your deck when you export its code so we could import it and take a look. you can also add me in Steam and in-game (current IGN is #CMW#SCAND Yulevia #REDDRAGONS#NSWP <- #'s are also the Coalitions I mostly use)įor someone who got this game a few days ago its really good. Also if you can post screenshots I can likely advise better. I think the biggest problem of both decks is that they are not flexible enough to counter many situations as you will lack the tools for it. Without Indirect fire, you will never be able to go on an offensive. Tunguska can work with their guns off I guess. Radvedka in Mi-24 feels like too expensive for actual use, I would rather use them in cheaper transports.ĪAs are almost all SEADable which can be risky as the enemy planes can deny you of your AA. No Spetzies? Ahh I guess this is an Armored Spec Deck. Sapery instead of Sapery '85 is recommended as the '85 version has less men without much if any damage boost.
what exact variants of the others? T-62 and T-55 isn't much worth so far, though the highest variants of both are semi usable as a line tank with ATGM. Getting a few better Tanks should be a good enough remedy though.Ģnd Deck T-80UM is the best T-80. On another note, what's in your planes? what Artilleries? Those Vehicles are also mostly outdated spam meat shields. But since they are hard to control I guess I'll concede there. Skipping out on Soviet Heli is unexpected, especially with that quality Heli.
Though Tunguska are fairly sufficient in most scenarios. Tunguska is a good choice, but don't be entirely dependent on it, while you can micro its guns to turn off the radar, a slight mistake in leaving it on will make it SEAD food. Grenade launcher BMP is a good choice for Urban warfare. I also believe I have AA in the form of 2 allocations of BUKs (Modernized variant), 2 allocations of Tunguskas, and one allocation of the highest-quality ZSU-23-4 variant.ġst Deck is not gonna fare well, having only cheap spam tanks will be a target practice for any half-decent tanks, its probably hardly gonna scratch a small group of M1A1 variants in a head on fight. BMP-Ts are in support of the mainstay of my armored divisions in urban areas, whilst Mi-24s of both variants stave off Abrams tanks, the random squad of riflemen, and other helicopters. Also, I have Razvedki carried in by Mi-24. As with my first deck, recon is T-55s, because although lower-quality, two whole allocations of them can cover a large portion of the map. Also, for AA, I have a LOT of Tunguskas, a few ZSU-23-4s of both variants, and some not entirely AA dedicated vehicles, like the BTR-152 with the 4 KPVT machineguns, and the ZSU-23-4 Afganskiy tanks to support the (Now dismounted) infantry in urban areas with fire support and light AA duties.ġst Guards Independent Heavy Tank DivisionĮmphasizes combined arms to an extent, but generally favors using only the finest Soviet machinery, such as the T-80BV (Or whichever the highest quality variant is) with T-80As, highest quality variants of T-72/64/62/55 held in reserve, supported by 3 allocations of Motostrelki brought to bear in BMP-2Ds, Sapery '85, etc. I have BMP-Ts allocated, along with PT-76Bs and other assorted lighter vehicles to support the main advance in flanking attacks.Īir support is very limited, I think the only air support I have allocated is the MI-24s that carry my Spetsnaz for behind-the-lines activities. Scout vehicles are pretty much just T-55s, again, emphasizing mass amounts of lower-quality vehicles. The grenade launcher helps in urban areas, and there is no reason to have an ATGM on a BMP if there are supporting tanks. I'm hoping my experience of other RTS will carry over, influencing my unit choice in my decks.Įmphasizes combined arms, with mass amounts of on-par tanks (T-55A, lowest variants of T-62/64/72) in support of my 3 entire allocations of Motostrelki brought in by BMP-1D. I got this game a few days ago, and am really liking it.
0 kommentar(er)
